Happy to clear things up! We currently don’t support the co-host like feature in Video SDK and have no plans to at the moment, so calling makeManager method will return the timeout error who shouldn’t have been a manager yet.
Should everyone be a manager by default then? As that’s what is currently happening. I’m just wondering what isManager and makeManager is for if it serves no purpose? Or do you have to revokeManager on anyone that joins that shouldn’t be a manager?
I’m just really confused as your documentation specifically says the opposite to what you’re saying above, saying managers function as co-hosts:
“Managers are participants with the ability to administrate meeting, such as by managing other participants or locking screen sharing. In this way, managers can function as co-hosts. There can be many managers in a meeting.”
From:
Which then goes on to tell you how to makeManager/revokeManager.
There has been a real lack in responsiveness since before Christmas on issues. This one in particular highlighted 2.5 months ago without resolution.
Is the Web Video SDK still undergoing active development or has it been sidelined?
I could really do with knowing, as this issue and now another issue with the screenshare not working (operation timeout on the viewing side) are now causing us to think we need to cut our losses in development and move to a different provider.
If you could please provide an update that would be appreciated.